Twin Cities operations have supported the Navy’s P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft since their introduction in 1962. St. Paul engineers developed the CP-901 and the software making it the AN/ASQ-114 system, the AN/AYK-10, and later the CP-2044 avionics computers for Navy aircraft. [lab]
From Jim Rapinac: The main avionics computer programs that I recall over my years at DSD were:
In 1962 the Univac marketing folks located a promising
Naval Air program at the Naval Air Development Center at Johnsville,
PA, called ANEW. {Editor's note: ANEW
is not an acronym, it is simply 'a new' approach to ASW, i.e.
using a digital versus an analog computer. } The objective of
this program was to greatly improve the Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW)
capabilities of the P-3 aircraft.
The then aircraft had an analog system
that needed to be updated to the digital world. With our NTDS work and
proven capability in building military digital computers, we were a
good fit to help them with their program.
Our
first attempt was the use of a “left over” computer from
the Titan program called ADD (Advance Digital Development) and a display
system to show the possibilities of a digital airborne ASW system. The
programming of the ADD computer proved to be very difficult so it was
abandoned early in the game.
In 1963 we sold
the development of a computer (CP-823U) for the ANEW test aircraft.
This aircraft made flights to St. Paul so our programmers could add
programs and make changes. Some test flights were made from here, one
to Lake Superior to test dropping sono-buoys with the digital system.
The system continued development and the flight
testing was set up at the Patuxent Naval Air Testing Center (Pax river)
in Maryland. These tests required some of our programmers to go on these
test flights. Some of our guys came back very airsick after going through
some of the flight maneuvers of the test. We decided to recognize their “beyond
the call of duty” effort and created the “Flying Programmer”
award for them. It was this dedicated, creative hard work by these programmers
that made this system go.
The system did go.
After many months of hardware and software problems, a sea test was
set. An American submarine was used as the target and the ANEW system
with our computer and software tracked it.
The
next step was a pre-production system. In 1966 we received our first
contract for the CP-901 computer. I was given the job to go to Washington
and pick it up. Programming for the new computer was also our job. The
system requirements were set by the Naval Air Development Center so
a Univac programming office was set up at Johnsville, PA [Westminster.]
Programming was also done in St. Paul.
Production
required a new interface for us to work with, the Lockheed company in
Burbank, CA. I believe we were the first to bring the new digital world
to Lockheed. We had several meetings with their management to explain
the ANEW system and to talk about planning for it.
After many months of software and hardware development the system was
coming together: software at Johnsville, hardware and software in St.
Paul, the aircraft and other system components in Burbank. It was a
thrill for me to go to Burbank and walk through the first P-3C on the
production line after all the struggles we went through to get to this
point.
Our first quantity production contract
for the CP-901 computer was received in 1968. The P-3C went on for many
years with many updates.
"What was ANEW Mod 2?" Marwood Clement replied in 2010: “You're asking a lot of someone who can barely remember what he did yesterday! The very first flight tests on the P-3 used the Air Force missile computer, {Ed note: Type 1020, CP-754} which was a 'dog' to program - we "extrapolated" from those confusing results to how good it was going to be. I always considered that my contribution was to suggest that we use the identical instruction repertoire as on the Q20 shipboard computer. That stopped a lot of debates at Johnsville and among our own engineers and didn't help IBM." Marwood Clement
After much “push and pull,” my wife finally got me in the mood to clean the basement. The first item I came across was the box of personal effects that all people take with them when they leave the company. Plowing through the box, I came across an old YP-3C Specification for Display Software that started to bring back old memories. It took me back to a day in the early 60s when Dan Brophy came to me with something scribbled on an 8 1/2 x 11 piece of paper. He said it was a navigation program that he wanted implemented in a prototype computer that Bob Blixt and crew were developing. The purpose of the whole exercise was to demonstrate that a digital computer could replace (at least in part) the current analog computers. To do this, the plan was to receive data from the P-3 navigation system and compute the airplane’s position and track. I don’t think anyone outside of Dan thought that it had a chance of working, especially management, because they gave the task to me. I had very little experience and certainly wasn’t the sharpest blade in the drawer! With a meager beginning, Dan somehow parlayed this small contract with NADC into a modest contract for demonstration software to be implemented in an airborne computer aboard the P-3. Hence, MOD 1 was launched and with it was launched an era of excellence that apparently is still going on with many spin-offs. You could fill an auditorium with the people who contributed to the success of this program, but I still remember the day that Dan approached me with a piece of paper and asked, “Can you implement this?
Well, back to cleaning the basement…- Contributed by Ned Hunter
From Ben Zaslow: I came across some P-3 info in your publication. Was doing some searching on my dad [Isadore Zaslow.] Dad was very involved in the P-3 early days. He told me he was the one who came up with the name ANEW. He may have been the 'program manager'. I still have his, perhaps one-of-a-kind, ANEW coffee mug, and plaque. He went on to become the science advisor to the sixth fleet in Naples Italy 1975-1978, then went on to London and Hawaii doing 'who knows what'. I have many great memories of hanging out as a kid at his work at Johnsville NADC, messing around with the green screen radar thing and the trackball, with a bank of humming "tape" computers behind me. Thought I'd chime in. {Editor's note: January 2015 - I sent Ben's inquiry to several people who were associated with the early days at the Naval Air Development Center (NADC). Their responses are listed here.}
From Art Francis: Hi Lowell, I remember the name but do not remember having any involvement with Isadore Zaslow. I was part of the first group to transfer to Warminster [NADC Johnsville] in 1965. If he was the Program Manager at that time the, onsite person to interface with him would have been Eldon Stevens who has been dead for several years. I believe I also have the same ANEW coffee mug from the first group made. Many people wanted one so a lot more were made and handed out. Many years ago Glen Hambleton told me he was in a meeting at NADC in 1962 when the project name ANEW was adopted. I do not remember him saying who suggested it. Art
From Glen Hambleton: Lowell; I did attend one of the initial meetings with Tom Morris at NADC as part of describing the requirements of what became known as ANEW. I don't recall any of the names of NADC personnel at the meeting. I believe it was at this meeting someone went to the chalk board and saying this program would be called A (something) and wrote A(NEW) on the board with the understanding it would be filled in with the next sequential number from the last NADC program. For one reason or another that update of numbers never happened and A(NEW) persisted. Glen
From Dan Brophy: Ben---- We certainly remember you and your brother Carl. You frequently got together with our kids who were about the same age. Your father was a remarkable man. He and his partner, Tony Greco, were largely responsible for the complex definition of the computerized airborne anti-submarine warfare (ASW) system dubbed ANEW by your father. He was instrumental in the definition and testing of new computerized ASW tactics. Isadore and I were at the Naval Air Test Center (NATC) for the first critical test of the ANEW system. NATC was typically very critical of new systems. After the test, your dad asked the test captain what he thought of the system since it was still in the early prototype stage. The captain 's answer was "buy it". The prototype system was successfully deployed during the Cuban missile crisis. Isadore continued to be the principal Navy development program manager until it went into the production of the P-3 aircraft. A post flight analysis system was also developed and deployed. Many of your dad's ideas were instrumental in the S-3A carrier based ASW aircraft. I have great memories of this brilliant man and cherish our collaboration and friendship. Dan Brophy
From Quent Fabro: Ben's father was the Project Manager for ANEW as I recall. I have a an organizational chart that shows Adm. Baughman as the overall Program manager with Isadore as the NADC Project Manager. He was the one responsible for directing the technical planning and managing the activities for technical success. Ben should very proud of his father for his major contributions to the ANEW/P-3C Projects. Isadore achieved program schedules and met all technical requirements. Without a doubt the ANEW Program was a success with 750 P-3C aircraft built and flown by 16 nations around the world [note: it may be more than 16]. Project ANEW spawned the P-3C Program (MOD 1-3), Tactical Support Centers (AWOCs), and the carrier version S-3A/B (ANEW Mods 4 & 5). I worked with NADC in all these programs in some capacity and worked with his father and many of the personnel shown on the organization chart. I flew for nine months with the ANEW Mod 3 crew at NATC at Patuxent River, MD with Commander Melcer, Ray Huntley, Lt. Jack Renney, Lt. Ray Bryant, Don Kulacz, Denny Schule and others. Another side note for Ben--I developed the ANEW display module software and trackball control for that green display [Stromberg Datagraphics AN/ASA-70 display] that you remember. I have more documents that can be scanned and provided--one being the "ANEW Story" produced by NADC in a non-classified version with controlled distribution. Jim Rapinac interfaced with Isadore and other Naval Management and was instrumental in securing Univac's position on the ANEW team and the future P-3C Program Development/Production Programs. He can provide other insights and memories of the program. Jim used to sing the "ANEW we Love you song" because it was such a good program for our company.
Art Francis was on board before I was and worked and flew on the Mod 1 ANEW plane with Capt/Adm. Waller.
From Jim Rapinac: I knew Izzy Zaslow for many years. He was chief engineer for project ANEW and reported to Capt. Fred Baughman. We had many meetings, lunches, and dinners together. Great guy with a good sense of humor. Give my regards to his son. Rapp
By Lowell Benson: Ben, after reading the comments by other UNIVACers, I realized that I'd met your father in the fall of 1967. At that time, a P-3 from NATC had flown into Minneapolis Naval Air Station to pick up CP-901 S/N 1. A field engineer and I flew with the computer to Johnsville, arriving about 8 in the evening. We unloaded quickly as the plane had to return to NATC. We moved the computer and our suitcases into the laboratory, uncrated the computer, plugged it in, turned on power, and ran the test programs to verify that the computer functioned. Then as we tried to leave NADC about 1 AM, the guards wouldn't let us go because we had no badges and they had no records of us arriving - civilians generally didn't fly on Navy aircraft. We called the laboratory, a man we'd been dealing with came out and convinced the guards that we were there legally. The next morning we did a formal test and that guy signed off on our paper work so that UNIVAC would get paid for the computer. I don't recall his name - BUT, it had to have been your father, Isadore Zaslow, as he certainly had the authority to get us off the base and to get UNIVAC paid - I think the invoice was over $1M.
From
Richard Cobbold, 3/4/2019: Hi All, I arrived at NADC in July 1968, as a Canadian Navy Exchange
Officer (LCDR), along with Cdr John Seeberger, and joined the A-NEW
Project. Fred Baughman had moved to NAVAIR by then and Cdr Don
Mayer was then the NADC/A-NEW Program Manager and Izzy Zaslow the
Technical Director. Capt Frank Ewald was the NADC Commander .
Gary Averill was the P-3 Mod-3 Project Leader. The A-NEW
Mod5-1 project was just underway using an A-3 Navy Skywarrior a/c as
the test bed....with a 30-bit core memory...wow! {Editor's
notes: CP-901 S/N2 was delivered and installed aboard the A-3. It
had a special I/O chassis and 64K words of memory vs. the 48k in the
pre-production and lot 1 production lot. There was a problem
that I, Lowell, had to solve, i. e. some inductive coupling in the
frame's memory buses.} Pax River ran
the flight test program for ANEW/MOD5-1 (LCdr Christianson as I
recall).
The RFP for the S-3 program was issued about that
time as well. I spent a couple of years kicking the tires on
both MOD3 and MOD5-1 and then moved over to being a Project Officer
for the LAMPS Test Bed (an HH-2D helo). The LAMPS Test Bed was
prototyping new sensors (radar and IR), computers/displays (IBM) and
doppler navigation systems as a follow-on to the already deployed
earlier LAMPS helos with their large APS-115 radar from the P-3
program. Tom Jadico led the technical team for the LAMPS Test Bed.
Cdr George Skezas was the Program Manager in NAVAIR. A number
of Canadian Exchange officers followed me, in succession: Stu
McGowan, Dave Crampton and Al Bingley. I returned to Canada
mid 1971 to our Staff College and subsequently resigned from the Navy.
Both the S-3A and LAMPS helo went on to very successful introduction
to Navy flight ops. Now at age 79 and well retired from the
aerospace business, I have very happy memories of good times at
NADC, both professionally and party-wise (Canadians had access to
duty free booze!). Best regards to former colleagues at
NADC......Dick Cobbold
In 1963, Univac Defense Systems Division designed,
developed and delivered a new airborne computer, CP-823U [Univac 1830]
to the Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA, for U.S. Navy’s
ANEW program, an advanced airborne digital avionics system for anti
submarine warfare. The CP-823U design was based on the instruction set
of the USQ-20B and was also software compatible. Future production versions
were assigned a USN nomenclature of CP-901.
In
1965, Univac was selected as the contractor to supply CP-901 computers
to the US Navy for the P-3C program, a digital avionics upgrade for
new land based Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW) aircraft.
Lockheed California
Aircraft Company, Burbank, CA, also known as CALAC, was the principle
contractor for the P-3C, and Univac and other suppliers were called
associate contractors. Univac CP-901 computers and other sub-systems
were contracted by the US Navy and shipped to CALAC as government furnished
equipment (GFE).
The Univac field office at Naval
Air Development Center (NADC), Warminster, PA, developed the P-3C operational
programs which were also GFE'd to CALAC. Over 40 programmers worked
on site at NADC and Univac continued work on various projects until
NADC was closed in the late 1980’s. Jim Rapinac's high school
friend's father, C.J. Henkel, had been chief engineer at CALAC but was
now retired. He introduced Mr. Rapinac to several CALAC executives including
George Papen, P-3C chief engineer, and Bert O'Laughlin, VP of Marketing.
We had open access to Don Wilder, President of CALAC, and his successors,
Fred Lashley and Fred Jacques. These high level contacts provided Univac
marketing and technical managers direct access to the CALAC P-3C program
office. CALAC was then an airframe company with little or no computer
or software expertise. We convinced them that to sell off P-3C aircraft
to the US Navy they had to have a system test program. George Papen
finally saw the light and bought the idea. The P-3C system test software
was one of Univac's largest software development programs at that time,
1968. More importantly, CALAC began to rely on Univac for software development
and support!
The open and honest management style
of Univac personnel combined with proven on time and on target performance
forged a new and mutually beneficial relationship with CALAC for the
P-3C program and future programs. Over 285 new P-3C aircraft were bought
under the original program and several upgrade programs have extended
the life of the P-3C, the first digital airborne anti-submarine warfare
system.
In 1967 the U.S. Navy announced a new
program, VS-X, a replacement for the Grumman S-2 carrier based ASW aircraft.
Unlike the P-3C program, the VS-X would be a total package procurement
with a single prime contractor. Grumman, McDonnell, Douglas, GD Convair,
and CALAC were the initial competitors for a Concept Definition Phase
Competition between 2 prime contractors followed by a down select to
a single prime contractor.
The 5 bidders all
contacted Univac DSD since at that time DSD had the only technical expertise
in airborne ASW digital systems. Mr. Rapinac was assigned as VS-X marketing
manager. We met with all 5 bidders several times over a period of 6
months. Our strategy was to select and team with one company. In 1967
Grumman and McDonnell Aircraft were the only bidders currently making
carrier based jet aircraft. Douglas and GD Convair made carrier based
propeller aircraft during World War II and CALAC had never designed
or built carrier based war planes.
Grumman decided
to pursue the F-4 replacement, VF-X, the F-14 Tomcat, which had planned
quantities of over 1000 aircraft versus the VS-X by of 183 planes. They
informally announced their no-bid decision, Grumman had been our first
choice for teaming and now we decided that the second best choice was
McDonnell Aircraft.
Then, McDonnell announced
a merged with Douglas. The two VS-X bidding teams, one in St. Louis
and the other in Long Beach, CA, were merged but frictions developed.
We were within weeks of finalizing a teaming agreement with McDonnell
Douglas when negotiations broke off. We decided to team with Lockheed
Aircraft.
The CALAC VS-X team included Fred Jacques,
Program Director ;Dick Heppe, Chief Engineer; Wally Weber, Marketing
Manager; and a new face, Sherm Mullen - who was brought to Burbank from
Lockheed Electronics, Plainfield, NJ, to develop a technical group for
digital computers, software and systems. Mullen later became President
of the Lockheed Skunk Works and was responsible for the F-117 and F-22
fighter programs.
After numerous private off-site
meetings at local Burbank restaurants, Univac DSD and CALAC signed an
exclusive VS-X teaming agreement. Univac would be responsible for the
computer and all operational programs and systems software. As part
of the teaming agreement, Univac agreed to locate a technical team in
Burbank, housed in Lockheed facilities.
In 1967,
the U.S. Navy awarded 12 month Concept Definition Phase contracts to
CALAC and GD Convair. It was no contest. CALAC won the VS-X development
and production contract for 183 aircraft and support systems in 1968.
The Univac portion of the initial contracts exceeded $200 million and
was the largest single award in the history of the division (at that
time.) Each 1832 airborne computer that was installed in S-3A aircraft
had an initial price of $1 million! The names of CALAC and Univac became
synonymous with success! As part of the Univac contract with CALAC for
the S-3A program, DSD established a site in Valencia, California, near
the CALAC Rye Canyon Facility. Over 40 programmers and systems engineers
were relocated from St. Paul and Warminster, PA to staff the new site.
Univac DSD people directly involved in the VS-X
program were Forrest Crowe, VP & General Manager, Dewaine Osman,
VP, Marketing, Forrest Lowe, Marketing Director, Avionics Systems, Arnie
Hendrickson, Bob Blixt, and Dan Brophy, DSD Avionics and Aerospace Engineering
and Jim Rapinac. There were also many other contributors in other functional
organizations.
Univac technical, management,
and marketing personnel had CALAC contractor badges that allowed open
access to CALAC buildings at the Burbank airport. Access to CALAC buildings
was shown on our contractor badges.
The S-3A program became one
of the most successful programs in U.S. Navy history. The program was
completed on schedule, within target costs and was very, very profitable
to both companies. Today, over 25 years after the initial contract award,
S-3B aircraft, upgraded versions of the S-3A, are still fully operational.
In 1971, Jim Rapinac was named as General Manager,
Sperry Univac, DSD, Salt Lake City, a division that supplied drone control
systems and wide band data links. While in Salt Lake City, the business
relationships with CALAC expanded to include the Skunk Works. We worked
with Kelly Johnson and, later, his successors, Ben Rich and Sherm Mullen.
The Salt Lake City group became a primary supplier of data links for
the U2, SR-71 and other covert aircraft. Our long term management relationships
with CALAC combined with a consistent record of or performance continued
to pay dividends and was mutually beneficial and profitable to both
companies.
The current Lockheed Martin facility
in Eagan has a long, successful and storied history in the global defense
and aerospace industry and has survived numerous corporate changes and
names including Engineering Research Associates (ERA), Remington Rand
Univac (RRU), Univac Defense Systems Division, Sperry Univac Defense
Products Group, Unisys, PARAMAX, Loral, and finally, Lockheed Martin
MS2.
Many current LM employees along with retired
Univac DSD personnel, including me, owe our career successes, whatever
they may be or have been, to the S-3A program and our association with
CALAC. For some, it was their life’s work!
I know that I speak for all retirees of Sperry Univac Defense Systems
Division when I say that nothing could be more appropriate or fitting
than to have the name of Lockheed Martin on Plant 8 in Eagan, MN. [Jim
Rapinac]
The Airborne Battlefield Command and Control Center (ABCCC III), loaded in a capsule aboard an EC-130E aircraft, provided an automated airborne command and control capability featuring computer generated color displays and digitally controlled communications. It went into immediate, successful service in Operation Desert Storm. It is best described by the 'system engineer', Bob Chappelear's career summary. [lab]
From Larry Bolton: These are the pictures I took at the Eglin AFB Armament Museum back in February 2007. The entrance to the ABCCC display is shown as is a couple shots of what you see just inside the door to the right of the sign. The switches are covered by a plastic sheet so you can’t actually touch the switches. There is a larger room just in back of the photograph that has the shock mounted seats. I did not get pictures of that because I recall there was a sign prohibiting pictures. I think some of the pictures by the sign show parts of that area, that is what the ABCCC display is at Eglin.
In
addition to this, they had an LM JASSM missile, a JDAM bomb, a B-52,
and our SR-71. They also have an A-bomb shell.
Lots of other interesting items for people who have electronic and military
backgrounds.
From Larry Debelak:
Ah yes---this is ABCCC II that we replaced with the ABCCC III nomenclature---we
got the Radios out of these capsules along with seven C130E A/C GFE
but like the an old radiator cap story we replaced the sheet metal capsules
with eight entirely new High Tech Capsules and fielded two of them just
in time (5 months out of our Plant 5 factory for the 15 Jan start of
the IRAQ war—two engineers flew combat mission and the 2 capsules
logged 400 hours of attack operations without a failure. As the Turnkey-Prime-Contractor
we made numerous upgrades [including the Intel upgrades that fixed the
Scott O’Grady F16 Saga of eating grubs for over a week.] These
system software refinements were proven when saving the downed F117
Pilot in a few Hours. We supported the Airborne Command Element in the
Bosnia and Kosovo operations out of Aviano Italy [the longest TDY in
USAF History—7 Years] with the home base in Davis Monthan AFB
in Tucson AZ.
ABCCC II was fielded in Viet Nam in the 1960’s to support communications for the long haul missions over North Vietnam. It was basically a set of 23 Radios, Crypto’s, the crossbar Communications Switch in your pictures with Grease Pencils and paper maps.
By Larry Debelak: We toured the USAF Museum at WPAFB in Dayton a couple of weeks ago and I was able to talk to the folks that have one of the capsules. They told me that it was sitting on the Ramp outside the refurbishment facility next to the RB-47. As we did the behind the scenes tour we saw it but couldn’t take pictures because it is on the base proper. A WPAFB employee said that they were planning to send it to DMAFB for safer storage but still maintain ownership.
Apparently they don’t have funding or space
to put it on display and the Museum has a Combat A/C Weapon, R&D
and Presidential A/C focus so they don’t have any C&C displays
[i.e. AWACS] and only up to the Viet Nam War/Cold war. Having said that
they are planning a new very large hangar for expansion and hopefully
will include the Gulf war, Bosnia/Kosovo [Longest TDY in USAF History,
7 Years]. Since there were no forces on the ground, ABCCC ran that war
as the Airborne Command Element.
As you recall when Scott O’Grady got shot down, UNISYS got funding
for the ABCCC updates that were successfully employed to recover the
F-117 pilot. This would make a compelling story of the impact that ABCCC
had as well as the AFMC Acquisition award and DCMA award for the Gulf
war.
By Lowell Benson: The ABCCC III description is on-line at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/ec-130e-abccc.htm.
The QUICKLOOK II RV-1D [Mohawk] manufactured by Grumman shows a rectangular sensor pod near the end of each wing.
Inboard of the sensor pods are 150 gal droppable fuel tanks [there were never any munitions on our RV-1 aircraft.] These together with the 300 gal main fuel cell just aft of cockpit gave us a 4 hour flight capability.
I do have information about the Sperry AN/UYK-23 computers in the QUICKLOOK II aircraft. In September 1973 when I arrived at UTL in Garland, TX the system was already assembled for us to begin training and I do not remember the UYK-23 designation for the QUICKLOOK 1a that we had in the two RV-1C aircraft. QUICKLOOK 1a was made up of just the two aircraft and was a prototype system. QUICKLOOK II had 36 RV-1D's after full rollout and I know they had UYK-23's in each aircraft.
Three of my NCOs became Warrant Officers after QUICKLOOK 1a and stayed with the system until they were rolled into the Advanced Guardrail program in the RU-21 aircraft and the Mohawks retired.
CW4 Donald Nesheim, USA Ret MOS 983A, Emanations Analysis Technician, Minneapolis, MN
My general understanding of the QUICKLOOK mission for the security agencies was to fly just outside the airspace of various countries and detect the impingement of radar signals. The computer and associated database information could then locate the radar site and ascertain the type of radar. If the radar type was associated with missile launch equipment, said information was sent to various intelligence agencies via the post flight reports. [LABenson]
This project put computers and systems aboard shipboard based helicopters for Anti-Submarine Warfare problems. {We need someone to write about this project/program.}
The Eagan LMCO facility manufactured the Desert Hawk surveillance drone and associated software. See the Links page for a connection to the U of MN for control research.
Chapter 62 edited
7/23/2024.